|
|||||||
(III.308-11) Miltons hierarchy is distinctive because of its individualistic, voluntaristic and meritocratic foundations. Anticlericalism Religion and politics were so intertwined in early modern Europe that it is appropriate to include Miltons anti-prelatical ideas in a discussion of the political aspects of Paradise Lost. Under Charles II Milton did not have the same freedom of discussion he enjoyed under the rule of Parliament in the 1640s and the Republic and Protectorate of the 1650s. As with the political environment of the 1660s, religion was a dangerous issue for Milton to openly discuss in Paradise Lost. Thus Miltons most powerful anticlericalism is most eloquently expressed by what he excludes. For example, Arminianism is sharply delineated from Laudianism by the exclusion of ritual and the role of mediators from Adam and Eves devotions and from their spiritual regeneration. A further division between contemporary Anglicans and puritans surrounded prayer. Milton valued the power of inner light for the call to prayer, claiming that without this interior prompting prayer was futile. Hence Adam and Eve pray in the evenings spontaneously, without the kneeling rituals (of the Book of Common Prayer), but standing up "This said unanimous, and other rites Observing none, but adoration pure Which God likes best" (IV.736-8) What is Miltons purpose in implicitly articulating all of this? If Adam and Eve can experience spiritual regeneration without the ritual and sacraments of the Church, so too can Miltons fallen contemporaries. It is part of Miltons thesis concerning liberty. Just as civil liberty is found in the republican form of government not an earthly monarchy but only that of God and of Christ, so too spiritual liberty is in the individual believers freedom to chose his or her faith in God, and when to receive the inner light. Miltons Republicanism and Paradise LostIt need not be illustrated here that Milton was an ardent republican. Paradise Lost is littered with numerous small-scale allusions or insinuations of republicanism. During the debate in hell Mammon argues "Let us not then pursue By force impossible, by leave obtained Unacceptable, though in heaven, our state Of splendid vassalage, but rather seek Our own good from ourselves, and from our own Live to ourselves, though in this vast recess, Free, and to none accountable, preferring Hard liberty before the easy yoke Of servile pomp. Our greatness will appear Then most conspicuous, when great things of small, |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Copyright: All texts on Bibliomania are © Bibliomania.com Ltd, and may not be reproduced in any form without our written permission. See our FAQ for more details. | |||||||