-
surface, and I am in a hurry to dive below. Therefore with this brief glance at the scenery that we pass
we shall plunge into the deep interior -- where the eye cannot penetrate, but where it is yet possible by
scientific reasoning to learn a great deal about the conditions.
Temperature in the InteriorBy mathematical methods it is possible to work out how fast the pressure increases as we go down into
the sun, and how fast the temperature must increase to withstand the pressure. The architect can work
out the stresses inside the piers of his building; he does not need to bore holes in them. Likewise the
astronomer can work out the stress or pressure at points inside the sun without boring a hole. Perhaps
it is more surprising that the temperature can be found by pure calculation. It is natural that you should
feel rather sceptical about our claim that we know how hot it is in the very middle of a star -- and you
may be still more sceptical when I divulge the actual figures! Therefore I had better describe the method
as far as I can. I shall not at tempt to go into detail, but I hope to show you that there is a clue which
might be followed up by appropriate mathematical methods. I must premise that the heat of a gas is chiefly the energy of motion of its particles hastening in all directions
and tending to scatter apart. It is this which gives a gas its elasticity or expansive force; the elasticity
of a gas is well known to every one through its practical application in a pneumatic tyre. Now imagine
yourself at some point deep down in the star where you can look upwards towards the surface or downwards
towards the centre. Wherever you are, a certain condition of balance must be reached; on the one hand
there is the weight of all the layers above you pressing downwards and trying to squeeze closer the gas
beneath; on the other hand there is the elasticity of the gas below you trying to expand and force the
superincumbent layers outwards. Since neither one thing nor the other happens and the star remains
practically unchanged for hundreds of years , we must infer that the two tendencies just balance. At
each point the elasticity of the gas must be just enough to balance the weight of the layers above; and
since it is the heat which furnishes the elasticity, this requirement settles how much heat the gas must
have. And so we find the degree of heat or temperature at each point.
The same thing can be expressed a little differently. As before, fix attention on a certain point in a star
and consider how the matter above it is supported. If it were not supported it would fall to the centre
under the attractive force of gravitation. The support is given by a succession of minute blows delivered
by the particles underneath; we have seen that their heat energy causes them to move in all directions,
and they keep on striking the matter above. Each blow gives a slight boost upwards, and the whole
succession of blows supports the upper material in shuttlecock fashion. (This process is not confined to
the stars; for instance, it is in this way that a motor car is supported by its tyres.) An increase of temperature
would mean an increase of activity of the particles, and therefore an increase in the rapidity and strength
of the blows. Evidently we have to assign a temperature such that the sum total of the blows is neither
too great nor too small to keep the upper material steadily supported. That in principle is our method of
calculating the temperature.
One obvious difficulty arises. The whole supporting force will depend not only on the activity of the particles
(temperature) but also on the number of them (density). Initially we do not know the density of the matter
at an arbitrary point deep within the sun. It is in this connexion that the ingenuity of the mathematician
is required. He has a definite amount of matter to play with, viz. the known mass of the sun; so the more
he uses in one part of the globe the less he will have to spare for other parts. He might say to himself,
'I do not want to exaggerate the temperature, so I will see if I can manage without going beyond 10,000,000
degrees.' That sets a limit to the activity to be ascribed to each particle; therefore when the mathematician
reaches a great depth in the sun and accordingly has a heavy weight of upper material to sustain, his
only resource is to use large numbers of particles to give the required total impulse. He will then find
that he has used up all his particles too fast, and has nothing left to fill up the centre. Of course his
structure, supported on nothing, would come tumbling down into the hollow. In that way we can prove
that it is impossible to build up a permanent star of the dimensions of the sun without introducing an
activity or temperature exceeding 10,000,000 degrees. The mathematician can go a step beyond this; instead
|
|
By PanEris
using Melati.
|
|
|
|
Copyright: All texts on Bibliomania are © Bibliomania.com Ltd,
and may not be reproduced in any form without our written permission.
See our FAQ for more details.
|
|