-
The first is this. An architect before pronouncing an opinion on the plans of a building will want to know
whether the material shown in the plans is to be wood or steel or tin or paper. Similarly it would seem
essential before working out details about the interior of a star to know whether it is made of heavy stuff
like lead or light stuff like carbon. By means of the spectroscope we can find out a great deal about the
chemical composition of the sun's atmosphere; but it would not be fair to take this as a sample of the
composition of the sun as a whole. It would be very risky to make a guess at the elements preponderating
in the deep interior. Thus we seem to have reached a deadlock. But now it turns out that when the
atoms are thoroughly smashed up , they all behave nearly alike -- at any rate in those properties with
which we are concerned in astronomy. The high temperature -- which we were inclined to be afraid of
at first -- has simplified things for us, because it has to a large extent eliminated differences between
different kinds of material. The structure of a star is an unusually simple physical problem; it is at low
temperatures such as we experience on the earth that matter begins to have troublesome and complicated
properties. Stellar atoms are nude savages innocent of the class distinctions of our fully arrayed terrestrial
atoms. We are thus able to make progress without guessing at the chemical composition of the interior.
It is necessary to make one reservation, viz. that there is not an excessive proportion of hydrogen. Hydrogen
has its own way of behaving; but it makes very little difference which of the other 91 elements predominate.
The other point is one about which I shall have more to say later. It is that we must realize that the atoms
in the stars are mutilated fragments of the bulky atoms with extended electron systems familiar to us on
the earth; and therefore the behaviour of stellar and terrestrial gases is by no means the same in regard
to properties which concern the size of the atoms.
To illustrate the effect of the chemical composition of a star, we revert to the problem of the support of
the upper layers by the gas underneath. At a given temperature every independent particle contributes
the same amount of support no matter what its mass or chemical nature; the lighter atoms make up for
their lack of mass by moving more actively. This is a well-known law originally found in experimental
chemistry, but now explained by the kinetic theory of Maxwell and Boltzmann. Suppose we had originally
assumed the sun to be composed entirely of silver atoms and had made our calculations of temperature
accordingly; afterwards we change our minds and substitute a lighter element, aluminium. A silver atom
weighs just four times as much as an aluminium atom; hence we must substitute four aluminium atoms
for every silver atom in order to keep the mass of the sun unchanged. But now the supporting force
will everywhere be quadrupled, and all the mass will be heaved outwards by it if we make no further
change. In order to keep the balance, the activity of each particle must be reduced in the ratio 1/4; that
means that we must assign throughout the aluminium sun temperatures 1/4 of those assigned to the
silver sun. Thus for unsmashed atoms a change in the assigned chemical composition makes a big
change in our inference as to the internal temperature.
But if electrons are broken away from the atom these also become independent particles rendering
support to the upper layers. A free electron gives just as much support as an atom does; it is of much
smaller mass, but it moves about a hundred times as fast. The smashing of one silver atom provides
47 free electrons, making with the residual nucleus of the atom 48 particles in all. The aluminium atom
gives 13 electrons or 14 particles in all; thus 4 aluminium atoms give 56 independent particles. The change
from smashed silver to an equal mass of smashed aluminium only means a change from 48 to 56 particles,
requiring a reduction of temperature by 14 per cent. We can tolerate that degree of uncertainty in our
estimates of internal temperature;[Note: Other substitutions for silver do not as a rule cause greater
change, and the differences are likely to be toned down by mixture of many elements. Excluding hydrogen,
the most extreme change is from 48 particles for silver to 81 particles for an equal mass of helium. But
for hydrogen the change is from 48 to 216, so that hydrogen gives widely different results from other
elements.]
it is a great improvement on the corresponding calculation for unsmashed atoms which was uncertain by
a factor 4.
|
|
By PanEris
using Melati.
|
|
|
|
Copyright: All texts on Bibliomania are © Bibliomania.com Ltd,
and may not be reproduced in any form without our written permission.
See our FAQ for more details.
|
|