|
||||||||
calls it a Montpelier. The derivation given by this illustrious scholar is more than questionable. The
name seems to be really a form of the Sanskrit Chaturgrama (=Tetrapolis), [or according to others of
Saptagrama, seven villages], and it is curious that near this position Ptolemy has a Pentapolis, very
probably the same place. Chaturgrama is still the name of a town in Ceylon, lat. 6°, long. 81°. CHITTLEDROOG, n.p. A fort S.W. of Bellary; properly Chitra Durgam, Red Hill (or Hill-Fort, or [picturesque fort]) called by the Mahommedans Chitaldurg (C. P. B.). CHITTORE, n.p. Chitor, or Chitorgarh, a very ancient and famous rock fortress in the Rajput State of Mewar. It is almost certainly the [Greek Text] Tiatoura of Ptolemy (vii. 1). 1533.Badour (i.e. Bahadur Shah) in Champanel sent to carry off a quantity of powder and shot and stores for the attack on Chitor, which occasioned some delay because the distance was so great.Correa, iii. 506. CHOBDAR, s. H. from P. chobdar, a stick-bearer. A frequent attendant of Indian nobles, and in former days of Anglo-Indian officials of rank. They are still a part of the state of the Viceroy, Governors, and Judges of the High Courts. The chobdars carry a staff overlaid with silver. 1442.At the end of the hall stand tchobdars drawn up in line.Abdur-Razzak, in India in the XV. Cent. 25.This usually accurate lady has been here misled, as if the word were chup- dar, silence-keeper, a hardly possible hybrid. CHOBWA, s. Burmese Tsaubwa, Siamese Chao, prince, king, also Chaohpa (compounded with hpa, heaven), and in Cushings Shan Dicty. and cacography, sow, lord, master, sowhpa, a hereditary prince. The word chu-hu, for chief, is found applied among tribes of Kwang-si, akin to the Shans, in A.D. 1150 (Prof. T. de la Couperie). The designation of the princes of the Shan States on the east of Burma, many of whom are (or were till lately) tributary to Ava. 1795.After them came the Chobwaas, or petty tributary princes: these are personages who, before the Birmans had extended their conquests over the vast territories which they now possess, had held small independent sovereignties which they were able to maintain so long as the balance of power continued doubtful between the Birmans, Peguers, and Siamese.Symes, 366. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Copyright: All texts on Bibliomania are © Bibliomania.com Ltd,
and may not be reproduced in any form without our written permission.
See our FAQ for more details. |
||||||||