|
||||||||
that the Arab practitioners whom he had consulted applied to the whole class the name delegi, a word
which we cannot identify, unless it originated in a clerical error for alelegi, i.e. ihlilaj. The last word
may perhaps be taken as covering all myrobalans; for according to the Glossary to Rhazes at Leyden
(quoted by Dozy, Suppt. i. 43) it applies to the Kabuli, the yellow, and the black (or Indian), whilst the
Emblic is also called Ihlilaj amlaj. Hulela (Myrobalan).The kinds recognised in the Medieval pharmacopoeia were five, viz.: (1) The Emblic myrobalan; which is the dried astringent fruit of the Anwula, anwla of Hind., the Emblica officinalis of Gaertner (Phyllanthus Emblica, L., N. O. Euphorbiaceae). The Persian name of this is amlah, but, as the Arabic amlaj suggests, probably in older Persian amlag, and hence no doubt Emblica. Garcia says it was called by the Arab physicians embelgi (which we should write ambalji). (2) The Belleric Myrobalan; the fruit of Terminalia Bellerica, Roxb. (N.O. Combretaceae), consisting of a small nut enclosed in a thin exterior rind. The Arabic name given in Ibn Baithar is balilij; in the old Latin version of A vicenna belilegi; and in Persian it is called balil and balila. Garcia says the Arab physicians called it beleregi (balirij, and in old Persian probably balirig) which accounts for Bellerica. (3) The Chebulic Myrobalan; the fruit of Terminalia Chebula, Roxb. The derivation of this name which we have given under CHEBULI is confirmed by the Persian name, which is Halila-i-Kabuli. It can hardly have been a product of Kabul, but may have been imported into Persia by that route, whence the name, as calicoes got their name from Calicut. Garcia says these myrobalans were called by his Arabs quebulgi. Ibn Baithar calls them halilaj, and many of the authorities whom he quotes specify them as Kabuli. (4) and (5). The Black Myrobalan, otherwise called Indian, and the Yellow or Citrine. These, according to Royle (Essay on Antiq. of Hindoo Medicine, pp. 3637), were both products of T. Chebula in different states; but this does not seem quite certain. Further varieties were sometimes recognised, and nine are said to be specified in a paper in an early vol. of the Philos. Transactions.2 One kind called Sini or Chinese, is mentioned by one of the authorities of Ibn Baithar, quoted below, and is referred to by Garcia. The virtues of Myrobalans are said to be extolled by Charaka, the oldest of the Sanskrit writers on Medicine. Some of the Arabian and Medieval Greek authors, referred to by Royle, also speak of a combination of different kinds of Myrobalan called Tryphera or Tryphala; a fact of great interest. For this is the triphala (Three-fruits) of Hindu medicine, which appears in Amarakosha (c. A.D. 500), as well as in a prescription of Susruta, the disciple of Charaka, and which is still, it would seem, familiar to the native Indian practitioners. It is, according to Royle, a combination of the black, yellow and Chebulic; but Garcia, who calls it tinepala (tin-phalin Hind. = Three-fruits), seems to imply that it consisted of the three kinds known in Goa, viz. citrine (or yellow), the Indian (or black), and the belleric. [Watt, Econ. Dict. vi. pt. iv. 32 seqq.] The emblic, he says, were not used in medicine there, only in tanning, like sumach. The Myrobalans imported in the Middle Ages seem often to have been preserved (in syrup ?). C. B. C. 340.[Greek Text] dioti h gennhsiV tou karpou en th arch esti cwriV glukuthtoV. Twn murabalanwn de dendrwn en th apch, otan fanwsin, oi karpoi eisi glukeiV koinwV de eisi strufnoi kai en th krasei autwn pikroi Aristoteles, De Plantis, ii. 10. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Copyright: All texts on Bibliomania are © Bibliomania.com Ltd,
and may not be reproduced in any form without our written permission.
See our FAQ for more details. |
||||||||